| Ron
Andrews |
 |
|
| The
following is excerpted from Ron's thesis: |
|
|
| In
Support Of Doubt |
 |
| William
Kentridge Drawing from Weighing...and Wanting 1997 |
| Introduction;
Footnotes; Bibliography
|
| Introduction
Irony there
may be, but no pun is intended, in the suggestion that perception
is the subject of various points of view. It is intended, however,
that sooner or later it will invoke a form of what may be called
'spatial thinking'[1],
an attribute that is likely to be a product of a dialogue between
the intellect and intuition. This thesis will suggest that our
natural facility for spatial thinking, a crucial feature of perception,
is a process of continual development and susceptible to significant
change as a consequence of exposure to modern imaging and communication
processes.
Firstly there is a consideration of a theoretical view by the
French philosopher Henri Bergson (1859-1941) who writes of the
'intuition of space' with reference to our understanding of the
concept of number. Secondly in an endeavour to understand a little
of the reality of how we came to possess such a faculty there
is a reference to the work of the archaeologist Schmandt-Besserat
who has constructed a theory that the inception of writing has
its origins in the concept of number. Engaging with number and
acquiring an ability to use language in its written form would
occupy space in the minds of increasing numbers of the peoples
of the world.
To present an appraisal of a work of art, for example, would become
as much a matter of cognition as that of an emotional response.
Bergson lived in a time of intense anthropological interest in
primitive cultures as did the formalist art critic Roger Fry (1866-1934)
who came later in life to appreciate the idea of a 'free aesthetic
impulse'[2].
Today William
Kentridge, an artist from Johannesburg, crosses technological,
cultural, and spatial boundaries with a body of work that includes
two-dimensional charcoal drawings on paper that are metamorphosed
by reworking into a distinctive form of animated film.
Throughout history there have been conceptual developments in
the representation of perceptions but today's rapid technological
changes bring to the fore the question of how much does the means
of our perception alter what is perceived and vice versa.
There may be implications for theories that propose spatial awareness
is more a matter of 'tactile values'[3]
than sight or that 'memory is inherent in nature'[4].
|
|
Footnotes
[1]
King (1990 p1) borrowed from Gould 1997
[2] Spalding (1980 p271) writing of Fry '...his belief that the
contrary value in art - its spiritual significance, is the product
of "free aesthetic impulse" '.
[3] Wollheim (1970 p67) There is an argument that proposes we cannot
see three-dimensionality directly but we see it through our sense
of touch and that when we look at a painting or drawing and see
space it is due to the manipulation of tactile cues.
[4] Sheldrake (1988 Preface) The hypothesis of formative causation. |
|
Bibliography
BERGSON, HENRI (1911) Creative Evolution Translated by
Arthur Mitchell Macmillan London
BERGSON, HENRI (1971) Time and Free Will Translated by
F. L. Pogson M.A. George Allen and Unwin Ltd London
FRY, ROGER (1924) The Artist and Psycho-Analysis Hogarth
Press
FRY, ROGER (1926) Transformations Chatto and Windus
KING,
RUSSELL (1990) Visions of the World and Languages of Maps
Trinity College Dublin
SCHMANDT-BESSERAT, DENISE (1992) Before Writing Vol 1 From
Counting to Cuneiform University of Texas Press Austin
SHELDRAKE, RUPERT (1988) The Presence of the Past Fontana
/ Collins
SPALDING, FRANCES (1980) Roger Fry: Art and Life Paul
Eleck Granada London
WOLLHEIM, R (1970) Art and its Objects Penguin Books |
| ©
Ron Andrews |
|