THE
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ART AND SCIENCE
Science
is empirical, grounded in evidence, and supported by facts.
A hypothesis is constructed and it is tested.
SEE:
'What is this thing called Science?' by Alan Chalmers:
http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WQh5wDlE8cwC&oi=fn
Of
central importance is the relationship between observer
and observed
Scientists
and artists both observe the world, however, their intentions
are different.
Scientific
observation involves control of the visual field, measuring,
units that can be repeated. Technology is often used (such as
micrsoscopes, genetic sequencing machines).
Importance
of non-contamination.
Above
all, there is a clear cut division between the observer (as
scientist) and observed.
In
comparison to the scientific approach, I now want to explore
how my own work as an artist engages with the material world.
IMAGES
OF EARLY PAINTINGS:
Methods
that employ intuition, 'non-control' over materials and the
visual world, reading into the image using imagination,
I
will use some examples of early work I made as a painter.
Trained
as a painter I use the processes of painting to explore inner
states (often emotions, memories, etc.). The position is highly
subjective.
This
is very different to the observer/observed relationship in science.
Ideas,
in the form of paint, emerge in an order that is POETIC
rather than an linear
order.
1ST
BODY OF ART RESIDENCY WORK
MOLECULAR
LABORATORY
RE-PRESENTING
TIME
ARTISTIC
PROCESSES
*
Suspension of the rational mind
*
The Subconscious
*
The Role of Accident
*
Ambiguity
* SURREALISM
* THE UNCONSCIOUS
* WORKING IN DARKSPACES
THE
SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY
First
impressions
GEOMETRIC
HARD-EDGED
PURITY
REPETITION
WHITISH
LIGHT
CLASSIFICATION
GRIDS
GENOMIC
DIRT
TRANSITIONS
NEWLYN GALLERY
RECOVERY
OF 'FLUIDITY'
EXISTENTIAL
RESPONSE TO KNOWLEDGE
ARTISTIC
PROCESSES
*
NON-PREDICTIVE
*
ABDICATION OF CONTROL
OVER VISUAL FIELD
*
USE OF CHANCE
*
CHANGING VIEWPOINTS
*
LONG EXPOSURE TIMES
WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE RESIDENCY
http://foresight.stanford.edu:3455/3/118
http://www.genomicsnetwork.ac.uk/egenis/people/artistinresidence/finalpiece/
ARTWORK EXPLORING GENETICS
Joanna Kane
THE SOMNAMBULISTS
'The
Somnambulists' is a series of photographic digital prints based
on photographs of early nineteenth century phrenological
casts.The images are large format monochrome digital photographs
with subtle digital adjustments which suggest an illusory sense
of the original living subject of the cast.
The project is called
'The Somnambulists', with refererence to mesmerism, current
at the time that many of the casts originate from, as the resulting
portraits appear to exist in an ambiguous suspended state between
life, death and sleep.
The images
are created using layered digital techniques which are essentially
photographic in nature to produce the illusion of skin, while
still retaining the details and marks from the original plaster
surface.
Data Profile Series
The Data Profiles series envisions fragments
from an imagined fictional data archive, - recognising that
where there are 21st century equivalents of nineteenth century
categorisations and taxonomies of the human psyche, they exist
in virtual or invisible numerical form, in code, online, in
data form, in files, in databases, data warehouses on globally
distributed networked servers.
The series aims to give
visual form to these coded encryptions of personal data, creating
data profiles or data portraits using photography and digital
imaging, to create geometric mathematically generated 3D data
portraits or 'profiles'. The notion of the profile is used to
bring together portraiture, genetic profiling, criminal profiling,
and consumer profiling, and related privacy issues.
Asa Johannesson
Portraits of Her series
These
area series of
portraits taken in the historically important style of the conventional
'mugshot' which was developed as a flawed physical measuring
system to catalogue and measure peoples faces by French policeman
Alphonse Bertillon. Asa Johannesson has used images of women
that are powerful and outside of the conventions of femininity
to raise questions about the idealization of women.
Portraits of Him series
These are portraits that explore the vexed area of biology and
gender. Johannesson questions in what respect our genetic inheritance
is gender determining, and what effect does nurture have on
gender identity. These tender elegiac portraits are all of females
who identity as male transgender because they have undertaken
testosterone treatment. It raises questions about how biological
advances realte to the cultural and social sphere of identity.
Eduardo Kac
GENESIS
http://www.ekac.org/geninfo2.html
"Genesis" (1998/99)
is a transgenic artwork that explores the intricate relationship
between biology, belief systems, information technology, dialogical
interaction, ethics, and the Internet. The key element of the
work is an "artist's gene",
i.e., a synthetic gene that I invented and that does not exist
in nature. This gene was created by translating a sentence from
the biblical book of Genesis into
Morse Code, and converting the Morse Code into DNA base
pairs according to a conversion principle specially developed
for this work. The sentence reads: "Let man have dominion
over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and
over every living thing that moves upon the earth." This
sentence was chosen for its implications regarding the dubious
notion of (divinely sanctioned) humanity's supremacy over nature.
Morse Code was chosen because, as first employed in radiotelegraphy,
it represents the dawn of the information age -- the genesis
of global communication
Marc Quinn
Quinn's self portrait
"self" is his signature piece in the art world. A
frozen sculpture of the artist's head made from 4.5 litres of
his own blood, taken from his body over a period of 5 months.
Portrait
of John E. Sulston (2001)
His portrait
of John E. Sulston, who
won the Nobel prize in 2002 for sequencing the human genome
on the Human Genome Project,[3]
is in the National Portrait
Gallery. It consists of bacteria containing
Sulston's DNA
in agar
jelly. "The portrait was made by our standard methods for
DNA cloning," writes Sulston. "My DNA was broken randomly
into segments, and treated so that they could be replicated
in bacteria. The bacteria containing the DNA segments were spread
out on agar jelly in the plate you see in the portrait."
Suzanne Ankers
Suzanne Ankers made sculptures
of chromosomes, emphasizing their resemblance to hieroglyphics
or letters of the alphabet — basic units of cultural information-storage.
Websites:
http://geneculture.org/
http://cfcul.fc.ul.pt/projectos/projecto_imagem/textos_imagem/ingeborgr_textos/TheArtofDNA11.pdf
http://www.viewingspace.com/genetics_culture/materials_genetics_culture/art_is_where_you_grow_it.pdf
http://www.ekac.org/gessert_council.html
Anker, Suzanne and Dorothy
Nelkin, (2004), 'The Molecular Gaze: Art in the Genetic Age',
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press